|
SGME Faculty May Be Added to Guide |
The faculty of the School of Graduate Medical Education has
petitioned the Senate to be officially added to the Faculty Guide. (SGME
faculty members are currently named in only a few sections of the Guide).
The motion was voted on at the April 2 meeting, and it was then forwarded
to the Faculty Guide Committee, chaired by Mary Ruzicka. The
committee, in consultation with the SGME faculty, will propose appropriate
amendments to update the Guide.

Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation and Welfare Committee has continued to monitor
developments in the area of benefits through its representatives on the Benefits
Advisory Committee.
The Committee also received and discussed at some length a
communication from the faculty of the Library on matters pertaining to
Librarians’ compensation. The Library faculty have agreed to research further
benchmarking data on compensation and workloads at other academic libraries.
The Committee has also discussed the salary picture for the
coming year. The budget presented to the Board last week included a 3% across
the board increase for all University employees. That budget also contained the
possibility of some significant revenue beyond budgeted expenses, if high
estimates of revenue in various areas are realized. The Committee is presently
discussing possible approaches to this funding, if the higher revenues happen
next year. All these discussions, however, are preliminary, until the proposed
budget is approved by the Board of Trustees.
hhhhhhhhhhh
Program Review Update
The
2004-2005 group of programs and departments to participate in Program
Review is as follows:
Religious Studies
Physics
Math and Computer Science
Social and Behavioral
Sciences
Honors
Jewish-Christian Studies
Graduate Public and
Healthcare Administration
Stillman School of Business
(all programs and departments)
EOP
Liberal Studies
The
cycle of programs for review is now available on the Senate home page.
|
|
Faculty Files Resolution
Passes
The Senate unanimously passed the following resolution
regarding faculty personnel files:
Whereas,
I. The Faculty Guide art. 8.1
clearly states that “The university shall maintain only two categories
of files for each faculty member.” The first category is the
“pre-employment file,” and the second is the “official personnel file.”
The official personnel file includes all documents that relate to a
faculty member’s work, performance or activity while employed by Seton
Hall University.
Whereas,
II.
Faculty Guide, art.
8.1 mandates that both the chairperson of
the department and the dean of the college and the school must include in
the official personnel file of a faculty member all work-related
documents. The failure by a dean of a college or school to include
in the official personnel file of a faculty member all work-related
documents, e.g. a chair’s letter of resignation as chair addressed to the
dean of the college or school, is a violation of the Faculty Guide,
art. 8.1.
Whereas,
III.
Faculty Guide, art.
8.4 unequivocally states that the chair of
the department has full access to the official personnel files of all
departmental faculty members: “The official personnel file of the faculty
member shall be made available to the department chairpersons, the dean,
the chairpersons of the college Rank and Tenure Committee, and the
University Rank and Tenure Committee. All persons having access to
personnel files shall maintain the contents of such files in confidence.”
And whereas,
IV. Denial of such access by the
dean of a college to a department chairperson is a clear violation of the
Faculty Guide, art .8.4. Such action has the effect of
creating a third category of files which is explicitly prohibited by the
Faculty
Guide, art. 8.1, “The university shall maintain only two
categories of personnel files for each faculty member.” [emphasis added]
ggggggggggg

Core Curriculum Update
The Core Curriculum Committee made a presentation to the Academic
Affairs Committee of the Board of Regents at its meeting in March. The
presentation basically repeated the overview of the development of the
core as presented to the faculty at the recent plenary. The Regents were
very receptive to the plans to create a signature experience for
undergraduates and have asked that members of the Committee return again
in June for a further update.
|
|
Be it resolved that: Any
creation of additional files by any other person, including a dean, when
these files contain work-related documents relevant to a faculty member’s
work performance, is a clear violation Faculty Guide, art. 8.1 and
must be prohibited.
According to the
Faculty Guide, art. 8.4, all persons who have access to faculty
official personnel files, including department chairs, must be given such
full access to these files. All persons with access have a
responsibility to keep the contents of these files confidential, but
access cannot be limited and files must be made available to all those
with the right to such access. The actual location of these official
files is not relevant to the right of access.
Access must be provided
regardless of whether the files are housed in the Provost’s office or in
the offices of the deans of the particular colleges and schools. The
Faculty Guide, article 8.4 states very clearly that department chairs
have the right to access all official personnel files of faculty members
in their departments, and in the absence of written modification of the
Faculty Guide, this right of access may not be limited by any person.
gggggg

Meeting Minutes
4-02-04
Executive
Committee Report
Senate Membership
Senate Committees
Images: Metropolitan
Museum of Art - Byzantium Exhibit
hhhhhh
If you have comments, questions, or
suggestions regarding the material in this newsletter, please contact Mary
Balkun, Faculty Senate Executive Secretary, at
balkunma@shu.edu.
[Developed for the Faculty
Senate by the TLTC.]
hhhhhh
|